Heh! Yes, an ignore function would be great. As for the function making a forum enjoyable, I disagree. The forum is enjoyable as it is. When those who wish to speak, can do so. Even - especially - if they want to be BA apologists, the more the merrier. I love it when people clearly direct their frustrations at posters like me, who speak their minds. To those who are censorious, stuffing their own ears and eyes is the last resort. What then happens is predictable...traffic in response to the newly-"invisible" poster drives them wild and soon they begin posting frustrated missives on how idiotic the unseen opinions are, how the mods should take control, direct the blight of responses away from the OP, etc. It's about speech control and when stuffing their own ears can't restore control, they melt down. This unfolding is very entertaining because it highlights the contradictions created by an inability to handle open discussion. Early signs of such propensity are posting eternally about methods of silencing other posters, or failing that, of ostentatiously ignoring them. We see the hallmarks of such a mindset here. It's truly hilarious when these guys post replies faking studied indifference to threads like this. These posters even seek the contrary opinions out. This, despite having acted in cahoots to censor such commentary in other places (!) This ironical hypocrisy is not lost on the observers. After all, Johnny and Jane Foreigner are smart - something that BA and the apologists often forget or want to disbelieve. Now on the upside, there are some very good prospects for the BA (or BAA) management recruiters here. Who better to defend the ideologies unmasked at LHR by jbc during the snow service interruption?