Test thread

Discussion in 'Off Topic' started by kiwi, Feb 5, 2011.

    • Original Member

    ThatJohn Silver Member

    [strike]strike[/strike]
    [em]em[/em]
    [strong]strong[/strong]
    • Original Member

    lipton Gold Member

    I was a test! Now I'm a human being.
    cockpitvisit likes this.
    • Original Member

    ThatJohn Silver Member

    Allegedly :p
    • Original Member

    lipton Gold Member

    Are you a designer baby?
    • Original Member

    ThatJohn Silver Member

    Test tube all the way. :)
    • Original Member

    lipton Gold Member

    Ok, I have to test something now: working
    • Original Member

    cockpitvisit Gold Member

    Use [s] instead of [strike]. It works fine.
    • Original Member

    kiwi Gold Member

    strike is [ s ] & [ / s ]

    check does [noparse]noparse[/noparse] work? answer no
    • Original Member

    Fanta Active Member

    can I test :rolleyes: in this thread or is there a dedicated one for such purpose? I wouldn't want to be Off Topic.
    Gargoyle likes this.
    • Original Member

    cockpitvisit Gold Member

    Test whatever you l[IMG]ke.
    Gargoyle likes this.
    • Original Member

    Gargoyle Milepoint Guide

    link from web image:
    [IMG]

    upload from hard drive:
    cutie-too.gif
    A liker and Fanta like this.
    • Original Member

    Gargoyle Milepoint Guide

    Why, when I quote, does it display the web linked image but just says that attach 565 for the uploaded image? I've seen this happen a number of times.
    A liker likes this.
    • Original Member

    Saracen Silver Member

    A liker likes this.
    • Original Member

    cockpitvisit Gold Member

    • Original Member

    A liker Active Member

    Tap. Tap. Tap.

    Nope. Sound isn't working.
    Cholula likes this.
    • Original Member

    SC Flier Gold Member

    Can table BBCode tags be supported?






    Award Points


    Cell


    Testing numbered lists since they weren't working in the wiki...
    1. Entry 1
    2. Entry 2
    Yep! Numbered (ordered) lists work here!
    • Original Member

    Gargoyle Milepoint Guide

    testing nested lists bbcode

    • one
    • two
    • three
        • aaa
        • bbb
        • ccc
        • subc1
        • subc2
        • ddd
        • subd2
        • eee
    Test of nested lists pasted from word


    1. Item 1
    2. Item 2
    3. Item3
    a. Sub a
    b. Sub b
    i. Inner m
    ii. Inner n
    iii. Inner 0
    c. Sub c
    i. Inner p
    4. Item 4
    5. Item 5
    • Original Member

    Gargoyle Milepoint Guide

    How do we create nested tables lists? The one I pasted from word looked good in preview, but lost formatting in the final.
    With bbcode I don't seem to be able to do a decent job of nesting tables.
    • Original Member

    SC Flier Gold Member

    Nested tables? Or nested lists?

    1. Item 1
    2. Item 2
    3. Item3
    a. Sub a
    b. Sub b
    i. Inner m
    ii. Inner n
    iii. Inner 0
    c. Sub c
    i. Inner p
    4. Item 4
    5. Item 5
    • Original Member

    Gargoyle Milepoint Guide

    Nested lists. That's what I want.

    In bbcode what you did looks simple enough- but how did you create it? by hand or with the indent and list icons?
    when I try it gets all screwed up.
    • Original Member

    SC Flier Gold Member

    I did it by hand with indents. Selected each set of rows, and clicked the indent button in the GUI editor. If you reply to the post, then you can go into the BBCode editor to view what my code looks like behind the scenes.
    • Original Member

    Gargoyle Milepoint Guide

    I see it in your bbcode, but when I try it screws up. Indent undos list, and if I indent twice the second time undos the first indent.

    Ah, looking closer at your bbcode, you're not using list at all, just indent.
    Still, when I indent twice, the second cancels the first instead of doing an indent=2
    • Original Member

    SC Flier Gold Member

    Sort of an odd thing about how BBCode gets handled in this forum is that tags which are allowed to span lines are reapplied to each individual line -- even if you had manually built the code in the BBCode Editor.

    Two bold lines in which the 2 lines were selected together in the Rich Text Editor and then had bold applied at once:
    bold line 1
    bold line 2

    Code:
    Two bold lines in which the 2 lines were selected together and then had bold applied at once:
    [B]bold line 1[/B]
    [B]bold line 2[/B]
    Two bold lines in which the 2 lines were manually wrapped with a single tag spanning both lines:
    bold line 1
    bold line 2

    Code:
    Two bold lines in which the 2 lines were manually wrapped with a single tag spanning both lines:
    [b]bold line 1
    bold line 2[/b]
    After submitting (or after passing to Preview), the manually tagged code still automatically had the bold tag applied to both lines individually.

    This might warrant a new thread for discussion -- particularly if the wiki doesn't behave the same way.
    • Original Member

    Gargoyle Milepoint Guide

    huh? it seems to be working this time.


    1. Item 1
    2. Item 2
    3. Item3
    a. Sub a
    b. Sub b
    i. Inner m
    ii. Inner n
    iii. Inner 0
    c. Sub c
    i. Inner p
    4. Item 4
    5. Item 5
    • Original Member

    SC Flier Gold Member

    Correct. I just indented the already-numbered list that you pasted in from Word. When copying a generated list from Word, it copies it as if it is all text -- not specially formatted/tagged text. So if I then applied list tags to your stuff from Word, it would look like this...
    1. 1. Item 1
    2. 2. Item 2
    3. 3. Item3
    4. a. Sub a
    5. b. Sub b
    6. i. Inner m
    7. ii. Inner n
    8. iii. Inner 0
    9. c. Sub c
    10. i. Inner p
    11. 4. Item 4
    12. 5. Item 5
    A variation combining lists and indents (which ignores sub-levels):
    1. 1. Item 1
    2. 2. Item 2
    3. 3. Item3
      1. a. Sub a
      2. b. Sub b
        1. i. Inner m
        2. ii. Inner n
        3. iii. Inner 0
      3. c. Sub c
      4. i. Inner p
    4. 4. Item 4
    5. 5. Item 5
    There are definitely some funny behaviors with dealing with lists in the RT Editor:

    If I start with this...
    1. Item 1
    2. Item 2
    3. Item 3
    4. Item 4
    ...and then click the Numbered List button while on Item 3, then Item 3 is removed from being part of a list, and Item 4 becomes its own list. Like this...

    1. Item 1
    2. Item 2
    Item 3
    1. Item 4
    ...and if I then try to put Item 3 back into the list, then it becomes its own independent list looking like this...
    1. Item 1
    2. Item 2
    1. Item 3
    1. Item 4
    ...and if I then highlight all 4 lines try to remove them all from lists and then try to join them back together as one list, I end up with this... :eek:
    1. Item 1
      Item 2
      Item 3
      Item 4

Share This Page